Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: November 2010

My recent blog post on ego and morale/engagement in the workplace received more hits than anything I have written in the last year.  I wonder why?  One reader wrote and told me that she found it quite stressful just reading about the stereotypical ego-driven manager and how (s)he operates, having had exactly such a person as boss in a previous job.  My argument in the previous blog was that ego is the biggest destroyer of morale and engagement at work, because in so many organizations, there are ego-driven managers.  But there are also, of course, ego driven employees, who may not have much power over others but are a pain to work with, and manage.  They drain the energy of the group and occupy too much time of the manager.  As host of an occupying force, their energy is not going to be focused on your organization and its goals, nearly as much as someone who does not have this trait.  Instead the ego-driven employee will spend inordinate amounts of time on other things, to satisfy the insatiable needs of this force which has them in its grip.

As we saw last time the ego is a false self, built up over time, and usually in childhood, to replace the “real” you, which you decided…unconsciously of course…was not “enough”.  Its like an inner conversation in which you said to yourself, “well I’m not making it with who I am now, so I am going to build a new “me” which will have the characteristics or exhibit the behaviors that I am sure will work with <fill in the blank>”.  At an early age, this blank is often filled with one or both parents.  At a later age, that role is often played by, guess who?  People at work.

This is a normal condition, only the famed spiritual writer Eckhart Tolle claims to have no ego, but the rest of us are stuck with one, to a greater or lesser extent.  The key is how much this false self stays unconscious and drives behavior; in some cases it will remain totally unknown to its host (the ego loves that, it is a stealthy creature) and even completely control its host.  If that is you, you simply have no idea what drives your life and would be amazed to find out.  The ego won’t easily let you, though, and will make you fight like crazy before any light is shone on itself.

We humans think we know ourselves as we get older, but often we do not; instead, we continue to do things which the ego demands in order for it to continue to exist.  Let’s look at some of these behaviors which might show up in your current or prospective employees or yes even….you:

–Sheila has a compulsive drive to up her personal Twitter and Facebook connections, even asking people she knows almost nothing about to become “friends” and competing with others who seem to have “made it” on these platforms.  As a result social networking takes up a significant part of her work day, even though much of it may not be business related.  (How’s that for a productive day?  You added 20 “friends” but got nothing done at work!)  Like many good activities and things in life, Facebook or Twitter can also become an addiction, and although Sheila does not think she is addicted to anything, she nonetheless feels a compulsion to act out this behavior. Unconsciously, Sheila has a deep belief that if she has 5000 Facebook friends she will have certain worth or value which was lacking when the count was 5.  When she reaches that number however, after a painfully short celebration, she finds that it does not “work” and she is no happier; unfortunately she is not allowed more than 5000 friends by Facebook, so is “stuck” there.  Sheila will look for another temporary and fragile solution, or if she is lucky and finds herself pushed by an inner drive or a good friend, be forced inwards for the journey which will lead her to a real and solid sense of self-esteem not based on external events, “friend” counts or material goods.

–Fred treats his bosses like parents, even gravitating to a boss whose style most (unconsciously) reminds him of a parent with whom he had problems.  This same mechanism is at work with the woman who marries a man who treats her like her father did, of course.  Its familiar, its what she is used to, what she thinks she deserves (good or bad, I am not saying this is always a bad thing, its just a common thing).  In the organization, we see this all the time.  We also see a more extreme version, where a mild mannered boss can be seen as a tyrant by an ego-possessed worker, whose bad childhood experience of “authority” makes anyone in an authority position ”bad” like the parent. This is of course a failure of perception, a projection of the parent onto someone who may not deserve it at all.  Of course, in Fred’s case, since Fred always seems to gravitate to people who are actually like his Dad, the perception could be close to reality!  Fred sees himself as a victim of these types of people, but of course he is not: he continually chooses them.  Until he understands his choices and why he makes them, he will continue to do this, and his organization will get less of his talent and energy and more of his childhood struggles.

–Mike expects to be rewarded for just showing up.  His ego has given him its inflated sense of “worth” which it transfers to its host. This is not to be confused with self-confidence or real self-esteem. The ego version is unrealistic and unearned; but if this is pointed out the ego will react harshly, to say the least!  Unfortunately Mike does not have a solid sense of himself as a good or capable person, so external signs are constantly solicited and he pressures his manager in ways that she finds very irritating.  In Mike’s case his problem was exacerbated by growing up at a time when his peer group of “Trophy Kids” was given awards for placing 4th in a race, for example. Constant positive feedback, which his ego demanded, was actually provided by a (temporary) cultural phenomenon, the expectations of which organizations still struggle with today.

–Johnny makes a confrontation of everything and plays to win at all times, even when this is not at all appropriate.  This drives other team members crazy; why can’t he relax and have fun sometimes, or let someone else shine?  Because his ego will not allow it, it requires constant proof that he, Johnny, is the best! Johnny’s ego scoffs at the idea of making room for, or celebrating the success of others, seeing such apparent generosity as “weakness”.

–Christine cannot receive anything but an “exceeds expectations” rating on the dreaded annual performance review.  Unlike the normal disappointment which might come to those who are rated “average” (although never using that word, always euphemistically called “meets expectations”), Christine goes into a major funk each time and gets into a verbal fight with her manager.  She also gets seriously discouraged, instead of being able to bounce back and excel based on what she has learned. This in turn reduces her chances of genuinely deserving a hike in the rating next time.

In each and every case here, the ego has taken over an individual.  In one way or another, and there are several ways in which this happens, a false and very fragile self has been created and maintained, sometimes for decades, and ends up causing havoc everywhere this person lives….including at work.  The amount of time and energy which goes into managing the hosts and the egos themselves is uncountable, because it is so widespread.  The customer satisfaction consequences of such ego-driven (and often disgruntled) employees are off the charts.  But there is hope, if we can identify early some of these cases and avoid them.  If not, then we have to look at ways to manage people we have hired (and did not know what was in store for us).  We will look at some of these strategies next time, as well as talk about what to do if these cases remind you of…YOU!

Bookmark and Share

I just got back from a long stay in Europe, where I live part time (in Germany). I am always surprised when I am there as to how bad customer service can be. I’m not talking about business to business service, I am talking about service in retail establishments like supermarkets, cafes and restaurants. We all know that Paris has a bad reputation for surly service, although I must say it is not worse there than in many other central European countries, and to a lesser extent in my native Great Britain.

Why am I so surprised? Because the Europeans often spend so much time training people in jobs like waiter, yet the results leave so much to be desired. A Swiss waiter or waitress will go through all the training about wines, types of and placement of cutlery, on and on, but when they deliver the food, except in the highest-end establishments, they throw it on the table with little or no eye contact or words exchanged. Language is not the issue, I speak their language(s). When I point this out to my Swiss or German friends, they agree, telling me that they are amazed in the other direction when they come to the states, how friendly and good the service is here, and how they are just “used to it” in their own countries and can do nothing to change what they see as a cultural phenomenon.

Let’s do an interesting comparison between two arms of the same company, the famous Aldi food store chain from Germany. Aldi (the word Aldi means “Albrecht Discount” because it was created by the Albrecht brothers, who became billionaires as a result of their creation), is a wildly successful concept for the German food market, selling a limited selection of inexpensive and good quality items in a fast paced environment, which flushes customers one-way through the aisles rather like IKEA. When one reaches checkout, the real fun begins, not only when a lane opens, which creates a stampede, but also when one reaches the clerk doing the scanning. Let me just say, you had better be prepared! Get your bag(s) ready, and fill them as soon as you can. You will receive no help from anyone to load your shopping, and heaven help you if you load slowly and drag out the waiting time for the line….the withering looks you get will drive you to a higher-end store like Tengelmann next time, if you are thin skinned.

Now let’s cross the Atlantic to the US, where Aldi owns a food store chain with a remarkably different culture, Trader Joe’s. TJ’s, as it is called by its many fans, was bought by Aldi around 1979, but few if any Americans know that. TJ’s and Aldi’s German stores could not be more different, not so much in the way they look or the quality of food they sell, although that is a bit different, but in the way things work. At TJ’s a line which opens does not result in a stampede, instead the person first in a longer line will be invited to be first in the new one. On arriving at the checkout, clerks will, in a remarkably relaxed and friendly way, check your stuff then load it expertly into the bag(s). No rush, no frenetic feeling, yet it all happens fast. TJ’s does not necessarily have more customers in the store at one time than Aldi, and yet it will always have six or so checkout lines going. Aldi tops out at three and often has only one, with the line snaking back into the store. That changes when enough people call out “neue Kasse”, or as the military would say, “call for backup!”

How is this possible? Clearly TJ’s is a profitable enterprise even given the apparent inefficiencies built into the system vis-à-vis its parent’s German stores, such as more checkout clerks and loading of customers’ bags by them. I bet Aldi has studied the numbers and would introduce the German system if they could….but of course they can’t! This is because the US has a shopping and general service culture which demands that customers be treated in a certain way. Having to stuff your own bags would be seen as a major insult; having the clerks do that is a minimum expectation. Having long checkout lines, the same. Germans are of course rather oriented to rules and perhaps they see the Aldi system as “those are the rules and I abide by them”. Faced with this situation, Americans would say, “those are the rules and unless they change I am voting with my feet and going elsewhere”.

This is a blog about morale and here is where I am leading to: I have shopped Aldi in Germany many times and when I look at the workers there they look somewhat burned out and certainly harried, tired, stressed. They rush from one task to another as if their life depended on it, and that includes when they have check-out duty. On a recent visit to a German Aldi, a friend of mine was looking for an item which she could not find and a clerk who was stocking shelves was working in the area; instead of stopping to help my friend, the clerk berated her for being in the way! The pressure on the clerks seems to be so intense that stopping for a customer, also in my experience, is almost the last thing they want to do.

Trader Joe’s people on the other hand, no matter if they are in California where I live or any other state, seem to have that “laid back” relaxed style even though they work fast and efficiently. They are friendly. I’m willing to bet their morale and engagement is head and shoulders above that of their German colleagues, which has many significant long-term implications for their business, their longevity on the job, and yes, on their individual health. This is a shame, Aldi has proved that they can master a system in the US that makes both workers and customers happy. For me as an Aldi customer in Germany, I only tolerate it to get the cheap coffee, cheese and wine which they have.

As for the heavily trained waiters in Switzerland and their non-existent people skills, give me an untrained US worker any time, who smiles at me and says the classic “have a nice day” when I leave. Better a fake smile than a real scowl.

Have a Nice Day!

Follow engageatwork on Twitter

Bookmark and Share

In all the time I have spent consulting with clients in the area of morale and engagement, I must say there is almost nothing which compares to the power of an employee survey.  I recognize that for some, the word survey elicits a groan, and the thought “on no, we just did that and nothing happened, why on earth so we have to go through this again?”  Others, like managers I have worked with, get excited at the thought and cannot wait to get back the results.  What is the difference between these surveys?

First of all let me say that I am going to preach to the choir here; those who conduct or plan to conduct surveys.  If you think that surveys are the most awful and useless thing that an organization can do, I can’t help you. I have written enough about why that is nonsense, in these pages, and now is not the time to re-hash those arguments.

Having said that, doing a survey without maximizing its power is like going to a well, painstakingly dropping the bucket all the way down, and bringing it up a quarter full….why such a small return for the effort and for the potential benefit?  As far as your workforce goes, why raise expectations and then deliver so little?   It makes no sense.   What makes sense is to squeeze as much value out of this process as you possibly can, and in return benefit your workforce and increase its potential for higher morale and engagement.

Maximizing the power of your survey occurs in several areas:

Questionnaire content:  I know that many of you use very small questionnaires such as Gallup’s Q12.  I am a fan of Gallup and used their data (with their permission) in my 2009 book, so this is not a criticism of them in general.  But why would anyone want to squander the opportunity to find out so many valuable things by not using a longer survey?  Because of the time it takes to complete?  But even long surveys (say 100+ items) can be completed in 20 minutes or less, not such a big investment of time.   Don’t you have a long list of things which you are dying to find out about from your people?   What about that new sales incentive program you just implemented with the outside salesforce?  What about the new marketing strategy, is it clear?   What about your benefits plan, on which you spend so much money, do its customers…your employees…see value in it equal to your investment?    What about the desire to leave the organization when things turn around, wouldn’t you be interested to see how spring-loaded your workforce is, when given a chance to confidentially say if they plan to stay more than a year…or less?  I could go on and on, there are so many opportunities to find out things which you need to know which you can know in a well designed, customized survey.   

Use of Professionals:  this is not a shameless plug for my profession of consulting.  Instead, its common sense.  Doing surveys is a real field of expertise, ideally requiring a background in behavioral science, statistics, social science research (including survey design) and general business knowledge.  As much as you might want to, don’t let a non-expert design your questionnaire, or analyze and interpret the data.  Your in-house resources might include such experts, in which case you are set; otherwise, spend the money to bring in help and don’t fall victim to poorly designed and incorrectly interpreted research (especially if you don’t know of its faults and make decisions based on this lack of knowledge…as in “you don’t know what you don’t know”).

–Mining of Data:   here we go back to the quarter-full bucket again.  Why generate all the data which you can from this kind of survey then fail to find the real meaning of what is being said, the trends over time, the differences between groups, etc?  Again expertise and (especially) software is essential.  I went looking for such software in 1987, when I started my consulting firm, but it didn’t exist so I had someone write it for me.  I now have a program which can take a 15,000 person company and analyze the results for me in one minute.  The data which it generates, rankings of internal groups by level of morale/engagement, never fails to have executives on the edge of their seats when the presentation is made to them.  You deserve nothing less with your own data.  The possibilities are endless:  if you are a stand-alone hospital, don’t you want to see all departments ranked in terms of engagement?  If you are a hospital system don’t you want to see each emergency room ranked against all emergency rooms in the system? Or a restaurant chain which has each store ranked against the whole or against its region….?  How about all managers in one area ranked against all managers at their level in your organization?

–Merging and Correlating Data from Other Sources: do you have customer satisfaction data?  Does it exist in one silo while the employee survey data exists in another, and never the twin shall meet?  If so, its a waste!  Let me tell you what I did for one client, Hilti:  I merged the employee and customer data and did some basic statistical analysis on it.  Looking at the data over time and staggering it in various simple ways, I showed that customer satisfaction there is driven (yes, driven) by morale and engagement.  Employees with more customer contact demonstrated this effect in direct proportion to their contact level.  So direct (outside) sales force morale/engagement had a much higher correlation with customer satisfaction than inside sales or those with little customer contact, which is exactly what one would expect if morale is driving CS.  You can do the same thing with your data, break down the silos and with a small amount of work you will know exactly now engagement works, not in some textbook but in your organization and how it effects your customers’ experience.  Its powerful stuff.

-Benchmarking (external or internal?):  notice that my example above uses internal benchmarking.  I am not talking about comparing you to outside organizations, many of which may not even be in the same business as you.  I don’t believe in such comparisons, for reasons I have described elsewhere.  The data I have on this is very compelling, so please follow the link and read it.  I am one of the few consultants to have seen competing benchmark data from different consultants, and lets just say it leaves much to be desired.  Stick to internal benchmarking, find the champions and best practices in your own operations, they will teach you what it takes, within your own culture, business sector and individual organization, to have a fully engaged workforce.

–Involving everyone in the process:  here is where there are so many complaints from people who have been surveyed.  In spite of all the work, the time, the hoopla, nothing happened with the results.  They might have been buried, such a short sighted thing to do after one has set up a positive expectation:  better not to do a survey than not to follow through with comprehensive feedback and involvement of all workers surveyed.  At least then you will be at zero and not minus 50!  Better still, invest , from the outset, in a complete process which requires not only the things I have talked about here but also feedback to everyone, no matter the results, and action planning involvement at the department level,  guided by survey results.  Then you can amaze people that “something actually happened from that survey we did”…..

This is a brief trip through some things you need to do.   Just doing one would greatly improve many surveys which don’t have that feature.  But don’t stop at one, work towards incorporating all these power tools so that you:

–know that the data you collected is valid and represents your organization accurately

–really know what is going on in every nook and cranny of your organization, as well as at the overall level

–know precisely what is working and what is not, for example that new sales incentive plan or dental insurance you introduced last year

–know precisely which managers are walking the talk and those which are just talking, based on the key input of their own people: how much more democratic can you get than that?

–know who your champions and centers of employee engagement excellence are

–know why they are doing so well and what others might learn from them

–can tell your entire workforce that they participated in something crucial to your culture and success and that their input was valued and used to the absolute maximum

Now that’s an engaging process from which your organization can and will benefit.

Bookmark and Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.